This is one of more bizzarre examples I’ve come across of hostility towards doing anything about climate change. Here, in the Times, Tim Montgomerie doesn’t deny that climate change is a fact, he just thinks we can’t afford to do anything about it.
Roughly speaking, his argument seems to be that, yes, the ship is sinking, but we can’t afford to use power on pumping it out, or it’ll slow down the engine.
Why doesn’t he work out the costs of not doing anything?